<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motorola Droid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bytemarks.org/motorola-droid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bytemarks.org/motorola-droid/</link>
	<description>The Intersection of Life, Culture and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: katherine</title>
		<link>http://bytemarks.org/motorola-droid/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bytemarks.org/?p=807#comment-373</guid>
		<description>all...
please explain/define further the &#039;mom&#039; factor you are talking about - how/why it is used to determine popularity of a product.
also... is this a &#039;young&#039; mom, or more mature one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all&#8230;<br />
please explain/define further the &#8216;mom&#8217; factor you are talking about &#8211; how/why it is used to determine popularity of a product.<br />
also&#8230; is this a &#8216;young&#8217; mom, or more mature one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://bytemarks.org/motorola-droid/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bytemarks.org/?p=807#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Hey Brian, thanks for the comments. I did fail to mention that the Droid does not have multi-touch capabilities for zooming in on a page. I agree with you that I found the double tapping a bit hit or miss, mostly miss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brian, thanks for the comments. I did fail to mention that the Droid does not have multi-touch capabilities for zooming in on a page. I agree with you that I found the double tapping a bit hit or miss, mostly miss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://bytemarks.org/motorola-droid/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bytemarks.org/?p=807#comment-355</guid>
		<description>Nice article. I played with it for a while too. Coming from the iPhone you expect the droid to do certain things. i.e. The iphone Safari browser is much better at navigating around the page. double tapping to a specific area of the page is very intuitive in Safari. On the droid it was hit or miss as to how it chose to zoom in/out with taps. very frustrating.

also the to me it seems you really have to &quot;learn&quot; how to navigate around the phone vs the iphone being easy to just pick and and figure out.

Based on these things I agree that the droid is really a geeky early adopter type phone. I don&#039;t see very basic consumers, moms, etc attracted to the droid. Heck, even Verizon is saying this phone is only for &quot;manly men&quot; with their advertising. Their advertising seems it&#039;s alienating prospective customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I played with it for a while too. Coming from the iPhone you expect the droid to do certain things. i.e. The iphone Safari browser is much better at navigating around the page. double tapping to a specific area of the page is very intuitive in Safari. On the droid it was hit or miss as to how it chose to zoom in/out with taps. very frustrating.</p>
<p>also the to me it seems you really have to &#8220;learn&#8221; how to navigate around the phone vs the iphone being easy to just pick and and figure out.</p>
<p>Based on these things I agree that the droid is really a geeky early adopter type phone. I don&#8217;t see very basic consumers, moms, etc attracted to the droid. Heck, even Verizon is saying this phone is only for &#8220;manly men&#8221; with their advertising. Their advertising seems it&#8217;s alienating prospective customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

